
Task 4
PollHab – Pollinators typical of habitats protected under the Habitats Directive
Coordination with Member States authorities and other stakeholders
The consortium will work closely with and consult national authorities and stakeholders represented in relevant Commission expert groups, in particular the following sub-groups set up under the EU Biodiversity Platform :
- The Working Group on Pollinators, and in particular its Task Force on Typical Species under the Habitat Directive, and
- The Sub-group on Reporting under the Nature Directives (NADEG).
Within the consortium several team members are also working within these working groups.
Dirk Maes, INBO is a member of the Task Force on typical species and Aidan Whitfield, BCE is a member of NADEG. Simon Potts is part of the Working Group on Pollinators. IEEP will coordinate the information sharing between members of the consortium, with BCE, UNIPD, and UREAD, in regular project meetings to ensure that the information flow between the project team and the Commission expert groups is smooth and timely.
Particular attention will be paid in the first six months to coordinating the information delivery to these groups with the finalisation of the Annex I habitat guidance methods that are being produced by the service contract led by ATECMA, that is also a partner here. Once the Annex I guidance methods are finalised, the communication of information from this research will reference them wherever relevant.

Workshops
IEEP will have responsibility for planning, running and reporting on four online consultation workshops in collaboration with the Commission.
These workshops are separate events
from the technical workshops described in Task 2 and Task 3 and will serve the
following purposes :
Task 1.
To reach agreement on the criteria for identifying typical pollinator species
Task 2.
To test and verify the proposed lists of typical species
Task 3.
To explain and gather feedback from external experts on the proposed monitoring
and management strategies
The focus of the workshops could be structured in several different ways, and these options will be presented and discussed with the Commission during the inception phase and finalised in discussion with the project team.
It is likely that the first and the final online workshops will focus on the proposed criteria for defining typical species and the proposed management strategies respectively and may nee to have a larger participant list and programme than the others.
The second and third workshops will likely focus on expert verification of the lists of typical species, identification.
These could be organised in several ways :
Pollinator group focus :
Separate online workshops for bees (Hymenoptera), butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera), hoverflies (Syrpidae / Diptera).
Advantages : easier for participants to discuss within their expert field, potentially easier to recruit participation,
Disadvantages : potential conflicts or interactions between groups may be missed.
Geographical focus :
Separate online workshops for southern, central, and northern Europe.
Advantages : easier to discuss specifics in relation to habitats and conditions,
smaller sets of species in discussion,
Disadvantages : does not reveal commonalities for habitats that are widespread in Europe.
Ecosystem focus :
Separate online workshops divided by habitat clusters, e.g. forests, grasslands and scrub/heath, wetlands and freshwater, mountains, coast and islands.
Advantages : easier to discuss specifics in relation to habitats and conditions, smaller sets of species in discussion,
Disadvantages : does not reveal commonalities for pollinator groups.
Approach to organising and delivering the consultation workshops
IEEP has a highly experienced team at organising conferences, workshops and other stakeholder convening events for the Commission and other clients.
Organising an online workshop involves careful planning and coordination to ensure a seamless experience for both hosts and participants.
The first step is setting up registration, which requires creating a clear and accessible registration process. This typically involves designing an online form to collect participant details, specifying the date, time, and platform of the workshop (e.g., Zoom, Microsoft Teams), and automating confirmation emails with login instructions and any pre-workshop materials. Depending on the size of the workshop, it’s also crucial to establish a registration cap or create waiting lists to manage participant numbers effectively.
Next, logistics such as scheduling reminders, ensuring reliable technical infrastructure, and coordinating with co-hosts or speakers are key. Setting up the virtual environment includes preparing any necessary slides, polls, breakout rooms, or other interactive elements. It is also essential to test all tech systems beforehand to avoid disruptions.
During the event, moderation is vital to ensure the workshop runs smoothly. The moderator, often someone other than the presenter, manages participant engagement, facilitates Q&A sessions, and handles technical issues, such as managing audio/video settings or troubleshooting any connection problems.
Finally, gathering feedback is critical for evaluation. A post-workshop survey will be sent to participants after each of the online consultation workshop focusing on areas like content quality, presentation effectiveness, technical aspects, and overall satisfaction. Tools like Google Forms, SurveyMonkey, or built-in platform features can help collect this data efficiently, providing insights that will help improve future workshops.
For each of the consultation events, IEEP will follow this procedure :
Determine basic information for event in consultation with partners :
● # expected attendees
● Create invite list with different partners
● Online platform preferences (Zoom, Teams)
● Create workshop agenda and timings + confirm the date
6 to 3 months before event
Set up the registration page
2 months before event
Sending out invites/ save the dates /reminders
1 month before event
Speakers
● ReachIng out to speakers/moderator
● Organise preparatory speaker meeting to go through theworkshop organisation
● Define timings
● Clarify goals of the event
1 month before event
Comms
● Social media promotion
● Page on website if needed including agenda and link to
registration page
1 month before event
Tech check on the day
1 hour before event starts
Feedback from participants
at end of event
Post-event
● Thank you email to speakers and attendees incl. survey and other workshop materials
● Debrief with the team
2 days after event
Event report
● Writing of short event report with summary of the feedback obtained and the points discussed
● Delivery of event report to Commission
within 1 month of event
Reporting on the consultation activities
IEEP will facilitate the consultation activities and provide regular and timely updates and
exchanges on the draft outputs and outcomes of Tasks 1 to 3 to the Commission.
After each online workshop, IEEP will compile a short event report with a summary of the feedback received from participants and the points that were discussed and decided, and where there were areas of disagreement or uncertainty.
The draft event report will be circulated to partners for feedback and delivered to the Commission within one month of the event.
