Task 4

Task 4

PollHab – Pollinators typical of habitats protected under the Habitats Directive

  • The Working Group on Pollinators, and in particular its Task Force on Typical Species under the Habitat Directive, and
  • The Sub-group on Reporting under the Nature Directives (NADEG).

Workshops


Task 1.

To reach agreement on the criteria for identifying typical pollinator species

Task 2.

To test and verify the proposed lists of typical species

Task 3.

To explain and gather feedback from external experts on the proposed monitoring
and management strategies


The focus of the workshops could be structured in several different ways, and these options will be presented and discussed with the Commission during the inception phase and finalised in discussion with the project team.

It is likely that the first and the final online workshops will focus on the proposed criteria for defining typical species and the proposed management strategies respectively and may nee to have a larger participant list and programme than the others.

The second and third workshops will likely focus on expert verification of the lists of typical species, identification.

These could be organised in several ways :


Pollinator group focus :

Separate online workshops for bees (Hymenoptera), butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera), hoverflies (Syrpidae / Diptera).

Advantages : easier for participants to discuss within their expert field, potentially easier to recruit participation,

Disadvantages : potential conflicts or interactions between groups may be missed.


Geographical focus :

Separate online workshops for southern, central, and northern Europe.

Advantages : easier to discuss specifics in relation to habitats and conditions,
smaller sets of species in discussion,

Disadvantages : does not reveal commonalities for habitats that are widespread in Europe.


Ecosystem focus :

Separate online workshops divided by habitat clusters, e.g. forests, grasslands and scrub/heath, wetlands and freshwater, mountains, coast and islands.

Advantages : easier to discuss specifics in relation to habitats and conditions, smaller sets of species in discussion,

Disadvantages : does not reveal commonalities for pollinator groups.

Determine basic information for event in consultation with partners :
● # expected attendees
● Create invite list with different partners
● Online platform preferences (Zoom, Teams)
● Create workshop agenda and timings + confirm the date

6 to 3 months before event


Set up the registration page

2 months before event


Sending out invites/ save the dates /reminders

1 month before event


Speakers
● ReachIng out to speakers/moderator
● Organise preparatory speaker meeting to go through theworkshop organisation
● Define timings
● Clarify goals of the event

1 month before event


Comms
● Social media promotion
● Page on website if needed including agenda and link to
registration page

1 month before event


Tech check on the day

1 hour before event starts


Feedback from participants

at end of event


Post-event
● Thank you email to speakers and attendees incl. survey and other workshop materials
● Debrief with the team

2 days after event


Event report
● Writing of short event report with summary of the feedback obtained and the points discussed
● Delivery of event report to Commission

within 1 month of event

Reporting on the consultation activities

IEEP will facilitate the consultation activities and provide regular and timely updates and
exchanges on the draft outputs and outcomes of Tasks 1 to 3 to the Commission.

After each online workshop, IEEP will compile a short event report with a summary of the feedback received from participants and the points that were discussed and decided, and where there were areas of disagreement or uncertainty.

The draft event report will be circulated to partners for feedback and delivered to the Commission within one month of the event.